A typical day in a high school.  So different, for so many students.  A big trend several years ago was to have block scheduling.  Students would basically have a double period of a subject and have that class every other day.  Some of the supposed benefits of this would allow for longer time to do hands on projects in school (science labs, tech., art, etc.).  Not a bad idea, but when teachers call it quits 10 -15 minutes early because they didn’t plan properly, I don’t see much benefit in that.  This trend of block scheduling seems to have faded, but in one of the schools I work in they are still “going strong” with blocks.  They have an even different take on this.  They do blocks, but have english/soc. in the 1st semester, and math/science 2nd semester.  This may resemble how college classes are run, but are high school students ready for that kind of schedule?  If they have a bad first marking period (problems at home, school, etc.) they are pretty much done for success in that class.  If they had classes all year and had a bad marking period, there would be a better chance for success because they have 3 more marking periods to raise grades.  This is just something I think about when I wonder are schools setting students up for success?  Does this benefit the student , or is it easier for administration to schedule?  I am not sure about the research behind the benefit of block schedule, but with most schools going back to a more traditional schedule I will assume the results were not great.  I wonder if the students were ever asked what kind of schedule would work best for them?  Why is it that students dont’ get to express their ideal school schedule?  It would be interesting if the student had a strong union like the teachers what would happen.  It should be our jobs as teachers to advocate and empower the students to speak up for their rights within the school about all topics (class electives, clubs, music, theater, athletics, govt., etc.)  If you are not going to, who will?